The blog about nothing

Monday, June 05, 2006

We, the people

It is a good thing that I have only a few readers because I think that I am going to be lynched for what I am about to say. However, I am confident about my line of thinking. So, I am going to do it anyway.

I have been receiving a lot of “forwarded” emails questioning the intellect of Human Resource Development Minister Arjun Singh and in general lampooning the concept of “reservations”. I have no reliable information on whether or not the good minister is a moron. Further, I do not know too much about the merits of reservations/ affirmative action either. I have not read any study on whether such actions have really benefitted the target group. So, I don’t know if it is a good or a bad idea. I don’t even know if “reservations” as they happen in India constitute affirmative action.

What I do know is that we can never solve any problems if we do not identify and define the problem correctly to start with. And I do think we are missing several points in this respect.

For starters, it does seem quite silly to think that Arjun Singh’s actions are driven by any deep affinity for backward communities or the concept of “reservations” in itself. I don’t think Mr. Singh cares two hoots for reservations and let us not think that he does. It is more reasonable to assume that his motive is in pleasing a large block of voters who will hopefully vote him to power.

I don’t think the actual agenda of any politician is reservations for backward communities, the distribution of large quantities of free colour televisions and computers or banning “The Da Vinci code”. They are hoping that these actions will help them win the support of a certain section of the electorate which will then vote them into power. To just mock the stupidity of these ideas is stupidity in itself. If we send the message that we think such ideas suck-by voting the proponents of these bad ideas out of power-then politicians will be compelled to make good choices.

I do believe that an irrational electorate that is subject too much “group think” and little common sense is the partial cause of bad political decisions.

Let us take the example of oil prices. The prices of oil are governed by the global forces of demand and supply. No politician in Delhi has any role in this (except beyond fixing import tariffs). Yet they routinely get blamed for price rises. The “economically sensible” thing would be a price hike from time to time. Keeping the prices artificially low through subsidies is just distorting the economy. Yet, not the most sensible politician can dare to raise prices even if he/she knows that it is the right thing to do so. Where do people think these subsidies come from anyway? Is not the protesting public at least a little bit culpable for bad decision making in this instance?

Back to the subject of reservations, I see much support for the concept of reservations based on economic need and not on caste. It is naïve and purblind to think that people in India are not discriminated on the basis of caste and that every citizen in this country has access to the same resources and has equal opportunities. Let’s get real. Does a bright young person from a backward caste in rural India have the same opportunities as an equally bright urban forward caste youngster in this country? I should think not.

I am not supporting “reservations” as it being currently implemented. This is just a blatant vote bank politics gimmick. But, some special action and spending targeted towards certain communities to create a more level playing field is important. We cannot let our objection to the concept of reservations lose sight of a good goal.

More importantly, we cannot let any group of self absorbed individuals from elitist institutions who have no grip on the real problems facing the country usurp our attention towards the cause of maintaining the pristine integrity of their institutions. As important as that cause is, it is relatively trivial.

We need new ideas. We need better ideas. But, where is it going to come from if people spend their time forwarding emails that call Arjun Singh a moron?

7 Comments:

At 11:35 PM, Blogger Free_as_Falcon said...

I think you seem to have missed the whole point totally. Most of the people who are protesting against reservations are not protesting against having reservations for backward communities. They are only against the way it is being carried out. If you look at it in the correct perspective, most of the beneficaries since the reservations were first implemented belong to the creamy layer of the OBC. Many of the SC/ST and other communities have not yet benefitted through it.

The government should have reservations in primary education rather than in professional colleges or in jobs. Unless every person gets the same kind of primary education there will be always be inequality in terms of quality.The quality is bound to suffer in the present system of reservations.

Even the group (Youth for Equality) spearheading the anti-quota stir has never said they dont want affirmative action. The question is whether this approach undertaken by the government is the correct one or not.

 
At 8:00 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

cynicalcount: I was going to just put something up of my own and crosslink, but I can't give your comment a pass.

At no juncture in her essay does Meera show any indication of missing the point. If any point-missing has occurred, I would have to spotlight you. The question was never whether the right kind of reservation is being implemented, but rather why the government is considering such a step. Meera suggests that there is no social/economic/developmental agenda at work, but rather an insidiously selfish political one that drives this initiative.

I can buy that to some extent. The reason I don't go all the way is this - most of the people such a step is supposed to help will never be in a position to benefit from it. However, that doesn't matter to the politician; he can safely and successfully proclaim in his speeches during election time that he implemented such a policy.

Churchill famously said that democracy gets the government it deserves. An ignorant electorate will continue to vote the corrupt to power by virtue of mass gullibility.

 
At 7:02 AM, Blogger Meera said...

@ cynical count
Reservations in primary education? Everybody should be getting primary education!!

There are any number of people who are completely against reservations. And who can blame them? The whole concept of affirmative action has been been mauled beyond recognition in India. I am just trying to say that the "motive" ( at least stated) behind reservations is a worthy one and "that" cause should not be abandoned.

As for "Youth for equality". The homepage on their website says "Infact we are all for the upliftment of the economically backward". Note, that they talk about the economically backward only whcih ties up with what I said about "much support for the concept of reservations based on economic need and not on caste".

For an inspired movement with a colourful logo and all, they only seem to know what they are against. It would be helpful if they had a bright suggestion or three on how they would go about the upliftment that they so support.

I say this amongst other things, because reservations was not the focus of my post. It was incidental to something else as indicated by the title of my post.

@ Sumant
I would not go so far as to say anything about insiduous selfishness... but yeah you have got the general drift.

 
At 11:49 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Meera: I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. A little dramatic excess seemed to be the order of the day. :)

 
At 11:55 PM, Blogger Meera said...

True Sumant:)
Your comment was good and I appreciate it. Thanks.

 
At 5:54 AM, Blogger Samanth Subramanian / Baradwaj Rangan said...

"As important as that cause is, it is relatively trivial."

What a nice line. :-)

 
At 6:18 AM, Blogger Meera said...

Thanks! Coming from you, it means a lot:)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home